Village of Virginia Gardens, Florida · Prepared by BusinessFlare®

Virginia Gardens — Annexation Feasibility Analysis

A fiscal and economic feasibility study of annexing a 1.6-square-mile industrial employment center beside Miami International Airport — quantifying the tax base, revenues, and service costs behind the Village's expansion.

1,026 acresproposed annexation area (1.6 sq mi)
$1.06Btotal 2021 taxable value added
169 parcelsof real property in the area
Overview

Turning an airport-adjacent industrial district into a fiscally strong municipal asset

The Village of Virginia Gardens is a fully built-out, single-family enclave of roughly 2,364 residents wedged against Miami International Airport and the 836/Palmetto Expressway. With almost no vacant land inside its borders, the Village has long sought to annex approximately 1.6 square miles of contiguous, commercially and industrially developed land to its southwest — an employment center with no residential population of its own.

BusinessFlare® was engaged to update the Village's 2017 annexation application to Miami-Dade County with fresh data. The analysis refreshed population, land-use, and tax-base figures; inventoried the services the Village would assume; and modeled the revenues the annexation would generate against the cost of delivering those services — the fiscal case at the heart of the County's approval process.

$1.06Bannexation-area taxable value
$5.17Mnew annual ad valorem revenue at 4.9 mills
14,961jobs in the combined area
$210Mexisting Village taxable value, for comparison
Visuals

The annexation area

The work

Explore the analysis

How BusinessFlare® built the fiscal case for annexing an airport-adjacent industrial district.

Virginia Gardens is essentially landlocked — a residential enclave with commercial frontage only along NW 57th Avenue and NW 36th Street. To grow its tax base, improve local governance over nearby development, and capture the economic activity on its doorstep, the Village proposed annexing about 1.6 square miles (1,026 acres) of contiguous land to its southwest.

Findings
  • 1,026-acre area (1.6 sq mi): ~694 acres of real property plus ~332 acres of right-of-way and water
  • 169 real-property parcels with ~6.57 million sq ft of existing building
  • No residential population — a pure commercial and industrial employment center
  • Predominantly IU-2 Heavy Manufacturing zoning (81% of acreage)

Using Miami-Dade Property Appraiser data, BusinessFlare® built a parcel-level tax-base summary for the annexation area — commercial, industrial, and governmental property plus tangible personal property — to establish exactly what the Village would gain.

Findings
  • Total 2021 taxable value of about $1.055 billion for the annexation area
  • Industrial property value of ~$677.6M, led by warehouse/terminal at ~$513.1M
  • Commercial property value of ~$303.1M, including office buildings at ~$168.6M
  • $73.9M in tangible personal property added to the rolls

The Village adopted a 4.9-mill rate for FY 2021/22 versus the County's 1.9283-mill UMSA rate. BusinessFlare® modeled the ad valorem revenue the annexation would generate and set it against both the County's reported cost of serving the area and the Village's estimated cost of enhanced service.

Findings
  • ~$5.17M in new annual municipal ad valorem revenue at 4.9 mills
  • County's reported 2018/19 cost to serve the area: $1,519,356
  • Estimated Village cost of enhanced services: $1.58M-$2.27M
  • ~942 active Business Tax Receipts could add ~$375,000 in annual revenue

The report inventoried every service the Village would provide or coordinate — police, fire, water, sewer, solid waste, roads, building, planning — and identified financing sources. Most services continue unchanged under Miami-Dade or FPL; the Village's primary new obligation is police coverage and select road maintenance.

Findings
  • Police: 22 sworn officers today; staffing to rise to 25-30 after annexation
  • Fire, water, and sewer stay with Miami-Dade at no cost to the Village
  • ~3.6 of 10.6 centerline miles of roadway become Village responsibility
  • Annexation-area calls for service ranged from ~2,800 to ~4,000 per year

Because revenue substantially exceeds the cost of service, the operating budget for the combined Village could be supported at a millage between roughly 2.0 and 2.5 mills. For property owners in the annexation area, the shift from County UMSA to Village governance translates into only a small change in the total millage they already pay.

Findings
  • Operating costs covered at a modeled 2.0-2.5 mills for the combined area
  • Total projected operating cost of $4.30M-$4.98M is fully revenue-covered
  • Millage impact on annexed properties limited to 0.4%-3.2%
  • Annexation strengthens the Village's tax base and captures local job growth
By the numbers

Key points